ABSTRACT
This experiment was
conducted in order to determine the mass moment of inertia at the centre of
gravity, IG and at the suspension points, IO1 and IO2
by oscillation. From the experiment conducted, the finding is that there are
some differences between the values of IO and IG from the
experiment data and also from theoretical value. The potential factors that
cause to the differences in values are further discussed. The finding is that the
wooden pendulum oscillates in non-uniform motion especially when it is
suspended at IO2. Based on the experiment, it is found out that the value
of IG and IO from both suspension points is totally
different although they share the same value of mass of the wooden pendulum.
The period is also different for both points setting. After the data was taken,
the period of oscillation, T1 and T2 are obtained
from the two different suspension points. Hence, after getting T value, then
the value of IG and IO can be measured. The errors that
occur might be due to disturbing from surrounding and human error. The time for
10 oscillations was taken manually by using stopwatch. By the end of this experiment, the values of
IG and IO are able to be calculated by using
the theory.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
A simple pendulum consists of a point-mass hanging on a length
of a string assumed to be weightless. A small weight hanging by a string from a
retort stand illustrates this condition. If the mass is displaced slightly from
its equilibrium position, the mass will perform simple harmonic oscillation. An
extended solid object that is free to swing on an axis is called a physical
pendulum, whose period is now dependant on the mass moment of inertia about the
rotational axis and it distance from the centre of mass.
A pendulum is a weight suspended from a pivot so
that it can swing freely. When a pendulum is displaced
from its resting equilibrium
position, it is subject to a restoring force
due to gravity
that will accelerate it back toward the equilibrium position. When released,
the restoring force combined with the pendulum's mass causes it to oscillate
about the equilibrium position, swinging back and forth. The time for one
complete cycle, a left swing and a right swing, is called the period. A
pendulum swings with a specific period which depends mainly on its length. From
its discovery around 1602 by Galileo Galilei, the regular motion of pendulums was
used for timekeeping, and was the world's most accurate timekeeping technology
until the 1930’s. Pendulums are used to regulate pendulum clocks,
and are used in scientific instruments such as accelerometers
and seismometers.
Historically they were used as gravimeters to
measure the acceleration
of gravity in geophysical surveys, and even as
a standard of length. The word 'pendulum' is new Latin,
from the Latin pendulus, meaning hanging.
2.0 THEORY
The
simple gravity pendulum is an
idealized mathematical model of a pendulum. This is a weight or bob on the end
of a weightless cord suspended from a pivot,
without friction.
When given an initial push, it will swing back and forth on constant amplitude.
Real pendulums are subject to friction and air drag,
so the amplitude of their swings declines.
A physical pendulum is a pendulum where the
pendulum mass is not concentrated at one point. In reality all pendulums are
physical, since it is not possible to achieve the ideal concentration of mass
at a single point.
An equilibrium moment is formed about the
suspension point to establish the equation of motion. The pendulum is deflected
about the angle,θ.
PROCEDURE:
- Wooden pendulum is hanged by a steel pin at first suspension point, O1.
- The pendulum is allowed to oscillate from left side to right side.
- The time taken for the pendulum to complete 10 oscillations is recorded by stopwatch.
- Steps 2 and 3 are repeated 3 times to obtain 3 readings in order to get the average time taken for 10 oscillations.
- Next, the pendulum is allowed to oscillate from right side to left side.
- The time taken for the pendulum to complete 10 oscillations is recorded by stopwatch.
- Steps 5 and 6 are repeated 3 times to obtain 3 readings in order to get the average time taken for 10 oscillations.
- The wooden pendulum is hanged by a steel pin at second suspension point, O2.
- Step 2 to 7 is repeated for the second suspension point, O2.
- Finally, the Mass Moment of Inertia (MMI), IG and IO are determined by using the equations of Mathematical and Physical Pendulum..
- The value obtained is compared with the value obtained from manual calculation.
Results:
1.
Time taken for 10 oscillations.
a.
At first suspension point, O1.
T1, s
|
T2, s
|
Tavg, s
|
||
From left side
|
14.33
|
14.21
|
14.27
|
|
From right side
|
14.16
|
14.13
|
14.15
|
b.
At second suspension point, O2.
T1, s
|
T2, s
|
Tavg, s
|
||
From left side
|
14.10
|
14.50
|
14.30
|
|
From right side
|
14.25
|
14.35
|
14.30
|
Sample
Calculations:
1. Volume of each component.
a.
Component 1.
b.
Component 2.
c.
Component 3.
d.
Total volume of the wooden
pendulum.
2. Total density of wooden pendulum.
3. Mass of each component.
4. Moment of Inertia about point O1 and point O2
(Experimental Calculation)
a.
Point O1.
Component
|
Area, A (m2)
|
![]() |
![]() |
1
|
0.8 x 0.08 = 0.064
|
0.4
|
0.0256
|
2
|
0.45 x 0.01 = 4.5 x 10-3
|
0.275
|
1.238 x 10-3
|
3
|
![]() |
0.762
|
3.45 x10-4
|
∑A = 0.0689
|
∑
![]() |


Component 1:
I1 = 1/12 m l² + m d²
= 1/12 (0.65)(0.8)2 + (0.6)(0.4 – 0.395)2
= 0.0347 kgm3
Component 2:
I2 = 1/12 m l² + m d²
= 1/12 (45.73 x10-3)(0.45)2 + (45.73 x10-3)(0.395-0.275)2
= 1.43 x 10-3 kgm3
Component 3:
I3 = 1/4 m r² + m d²
= 1/4 (4.6 x10-3)(0.012)2 + (4.6 x10-3)(0.762-0.395)2
= 6.2 x 10-4 kgm3
Total:
IG1 = I1
– I2 – I3
= 0.0347 – 1.43 X 10-3 – 6.2
X10-4
=
0.03265 kgm3
Io1 = IG1
+ md2
= 0.03265 + (0.6)(0.395)
= 0.1092 kgm3
b.
Point O2.
Component
|
Area, A (m2)
|
![]() |
![]() |
1
|
0.8 x 0.08 = 0.064
|
0.4
|
0.0256
|
2
|
0.45 x 0.01 = 4.5 x 10-3
|
0.525
|
2.3265 x 10-3
|
3
|
![]() |
0.038
|
1.719 x10-5
|
∑A = 0.0689
|
∑
![]() |


Component 1:
I1 = 1/12 m l² + m d²
= 1/12 (0.65)(0.8)2 + (0.65)(0.4061 – 0.4)2
= 0.0347 kgm3
Component 2:
I2 = 1/12 m l² + m d²
= 1/12 (45.73 x10-3)(0.45)2 + (45.73 x10-3)(0.525
– 0.4061)2
= 1.418 x 10-3 kgm3
Component 3:
I3 = 1/4 m r² + m d²
= 1/4 (4.6 x10-3)(0.012)2 + (4.6 x10-3)(0.4061-0.038)2
= 6.234 x 10-4 kgm3
Total:
IG2 = I1
– I2 – I3
= 0.0347 – 1.418 X 10-3 – 6.234
X10-4
=
0.03266 kgm3
Io2 = IG2
+ md2
= 0.03266 + (0.6)(0.4061)
= 0.2763 kgm3
5. Moment of Inertia about point O1 and point O2
(Theoretical Calculation)
a.
O1
Tavg = 14.21 s
Therefore:

T1
oscilations = 2π

L01
= g T1
oscilations
2 π


2π
L01 = 0.5018 m
IG1
= m rG ( L01 - rG
)
= 0.6(0.355) (0.5018 - 0.355)
= 0.0313kg m³
IO1
= IG1 + m rG²
= 0.0313 + 0.6 (0.355) ²
= 0.1069 kg m²
b.
O2
Tavg
= 14.30s
Therefore:

T2
oscilations = 2π

L02
= g T2 oscilations
2
π


= 9.81 1.398
2π
L02 = 0.4857 m
IG2
= m rG ( L02
- rG )
=
0.6(0.355) (0.4857 - 0.355)
=
0.0278 kg m³
I02 = IG02 + m rG²
=
0.0278 + 0.6 (0.355) ²
=
0.1034 kg m²
6. Percentage Error.
For
IO1, percentage of error % = (0.1092– 0.1042) x 100%

= 4.58%
For
IG1, percentage of error % = (0.0326 – 0.0285) x 100%

=
12.71 %
For
I02, percentage of error % = (0.2763 – 0.1034) x 100%

=
62.58%
For
IG2, percentage of error % = (0.0326 – 0.0278) x 100%

=
`14.88%
Point
|
Moment of Inertia
|
Theoretical Value (kg m³)
|
Experimental Value(kg m³)
|
Percentage Error (%)
|
O1
|
IO1
|
0.1092
|
0.1042
|
5.39
|
IG1
|
0.0326
|
0.0285
|
15.16
|
|
O2
|
IO2
|
0.2763
|
0.1034
|
18.76
|
IG2
|
0.0326
|
0.0278
|
17.33
|
5.1 DISCUSSION
Based on
the experiment conducted, all the values of mass moment of inertia at the
centre of gravity, IG and at the suspension point, IO on
different end, O1 and O2 have been determined according
to the experiment and theory. The values of IO1, IG1, IO2 and IG2 are
theoretically calculated using formulae and finding the volume of each
component exist in the non-homogeneous wooden pendulum. The values of IO1, IG1,
IO2 and IG2 are experimentally determined by taking time for 10 complete
oscillation of the wooden pendulum on different angle for each suspension
point. Comparing all the values of IO1, IG1, IO2 and IG2 in theoretical and
experimental calculation, it is found out that each value is slightly different
from each other. The percentage error between the theoretical and experimental
values can be observed in Table 4.1. The percentage errors are merely less than
20% and therefore can be considered as acceptable. The difference in values may
be caused by several errors during the experiment and calculation. The
dimension of the wooden pendulum may be taken under parallax and precision
errors as only a ruler is used to take the dimensions of the wooden pendulum
including the circular parts. Therefore, this might affect the reading taken.
During the oscillation, a stopwatch is used and therefore, there might be zero
error as the starting of the swing is not precisely parallel with the starting
of the time taken. This may cause the time to be slower or faster than it is
supposed to be recorded. The oscillation of the wooden pendulum especially on
the smaller circle, O2 is wobbling as the supporting part is so small and this
cause disturbance during the oscillation. In the calculation procedure, only
several decimal points are considered and this also affected all the values
calculated. All of this disturbance and errors has affected the values of IO1,
IG1, IO2 and IG2 obtained.
6.1 CONCLUSION
In a nutshell, it is found out that a pendulum is a weight suspended from a pivot so that it can swing freely. When a
pendulum is displaced from its equilibrium position, it is subjected to a restoring force due to gravity that will accelerate it back toward
the equilibrium position. When released, the restoring force combined with the
pendulum's mass causes it to oscillate about the equilibrium position,
swinging back and forth. The time for one complete cycle, a left swing and a
right swing, is called the period. A pendulum swings with a specific
period which depends mainly on its length. It is also found out that
the values of IO1, IG1, IO2 and IG2 are affected by errors and disturbance
during experiment and even decimal points consideration during calculation is a
contributing factor. The error percentage between the theoretical and
experimental values can be considered as a slight error as the values of the
error are just less than 20%.
links for lab report:
full lab- http://www.mediafire.com/view/?0o9ey6j8rfsaunb
result by blogger- http://www.mediafire.com/view/?b82tb62ilctnq1a
abstract to theory - http://www.mediafire.com/view/?2yr3qkb6bbj57h7
No comments:
Post a Comment